<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:56:05 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Canadian Carbon Control</title><description>Searching for low carbon futures in the great white north</description><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>44</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-3298944352095568817</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-04-17T09:14:15.595-05:00</atom:updated><title>My tragic hiatus</title><atom:summary type='text'>Hello loyal readers,Sorry about the month long hiatus that has no doubt left all of you on tenterhooks.  My excuse: once copious free time has been eaten up by various work projects.  I will try to start this up again in June or July - meanwhile, the various links on the sidebar should give you endless amounts of sharp, insightful environmental commentary.</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/04/my-tragic-hiatus.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-2011321782860538347</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-22T21:41:53.807-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>large final emitters</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clean Air Act</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>GHG reductions targets</category><title>Conservatives will let Clean Air Act die?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Today's National Post gives a great analysis of the trials and tribulations of the Clean Air Act over the last few months.  According to the article, the Tories are likely to let the Clean Air Act die on the order paper and simply bring out regulations for Large Final Emitters using existing legislation.  Article author John Ivison explains that two factors are at work.  Firstly, a majority of </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/conservatives-will-let-clean-air-act.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-2553898585581961445</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-22T21:14:51.812-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>clean development mechanism</category><title>Baird open to some international emissions trading?</title><atom:summary type='text'>A pro-international emissions trading piece at globeandmail.com yesterday mentions that Environment Minister John Baird has indicated he is open to including some international trading in his climate change plan.  The piece doesn't offer further details, but does provide an overview of emissions trading and the opportunities involved in international trading.Emissions trading: Like foreign aid, </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/baird-open-to-some-international.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-7713584492459116797</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 02:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-18T22:41:40.424-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>large final emitters</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>2007 election</category><title>Liberals grab FoE's proposal and run with it</title><atom:summary type='text'>Repeat after me - I love minority government.  Sure, elections every year or two mean little gets actually done on climate change, but meanwhile the Liberals and Conservatives are  one-upping each other to the point where radical environmental proposals transmogrify into mainstream policy!In January, Friends of the Earth and Corporate Knights publicized a proposal to create an emissions tax at 30</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/liberals-grab-foes-proposal-and-run.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8146832342136453940</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 02:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-14T21:33:27.910-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>2007 election</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>Liberals eying absolute targets for large emitters?</title><atom:summary type='text'>Tiny story in today's online National Post - the Liberals are supposedly considering absolute targets for large final emitters as part of their election plan, as opposed to the intensity-based targets that the Conservatives (and previous Liberal governments) have been working on.National Post storyMy Comments: I'm very glad to see absolute targets being discussed for emissions trading, and I hope</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/liberals-eying-absolute-targets-for.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8782787802349300881</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 05:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-14T23:08:00.530-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><title>Let's set up some markets - TD bank report</title><atom:summary type='text'>Toronto Dominion Bank released a report on March 7 calling for market based solutions for climate change.  You tell 'em, my financially-inclined brethren!  The 21-page report, "Market-Based Solutions to Protect the Environment" is 80% introduction to climate change policy options and 20% suggestions for Canada, with a focus on carbon taxes and emissions trading systems (ETS).  It doesn't take a </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/lets-set-up-some-markets-td-bank-report.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-679284529359198243</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-10T23:48:54.043-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>SGER</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Alberta</category><title>More Alberta "Carbon Tax" madness</title><atom:summary type='text'>Yesterday's Calgary herald also calls the SGER penalty for emissions beyond regulated targets a carbon tax (see last two posts for more on this), and talks briefly about the politics behind it all, federally and provincially:The goal is to paint Harper and Alberta green so the federal Conservatives can go to the polls this spring without having to attack the prime minister's own province. There </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/more-alberta-carbon-tax-madness.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-1187780857144844078</guid><pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-10T23:49:27.259-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>SGER</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Alberta</category><title>De facto Canadian carbon taxes</title><atom:summary type='text'>The Globe and Mail has a story today on Harper and Stelmach's recent announcements re carbon sequestration investments (the CO2 pipeline etc.), but what caught my eye was a reference to "Alberta's new carbon tax".  They are referring to the $15.00/tonne charge on emissions beyond the targets included in the new proposed "Specific Gas Emitters Regulation" (SGER - say that ten times real fast).  </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/de-facto-canadian-carbon-taxes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media='http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/' url='http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dblXVMNp7eY/RfOIAVBD4oI/AAAAAAAAAAM/aDpQa206h-c/s72-c/conservative+solar+backpack.JPG' height='72' width='72'/><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8014093961095653126</guid><pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2007 02:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-10T23:50:11.312-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>SGER</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Alberta</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>Alberta announces regulations for LIEs based on emissions-intensity</title><atom:summary type='text'>Alberta announced its new (proposed) Specified Gas Emitters Regulation (SGER) yesterday, part of Bill 3, a proposed amendment to the Climate Change and Emissions Management Act.  SGER requires facilities that emit more than 100 000 tonnes of GHGs (CO2e?)/year to reduce their emissions intensity by 12% starting July 1 2007, or elsebuy Alberta-based offsetsbuy "emissions performance credits" from </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/alberta-announces-regulations-for-lies.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-6750132974547933994</guid><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-07T12:49:16.735-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>clean development mechanism</category><title>Update on FoE / Corporate Knights proposal</title><atom:summary type='text'>Corresponded via email  today with Toby Heaps of Corporate Knights re his proposal for meeting Canada's Kyoto targets.  Here is what he had to say on capital investment cycles and emissions trading:Given that many of the LFEs need to take capital investment cycles into consideration,  do you think that that some of them will not be able to efficiently use the tax taken from them within the 3-year</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/update-on-foe-corporate-knights.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-757849632025621809</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-03-05T17:09:38.939-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>Carbon taxes back on the table, at least for 48 hours</title><atom:summary type='text'>Very pleased to hear some more serious discussion of carbon/GHG taxation in Canada today.  CBC's the Current had two pieces on carbon taxes today (see link below to listen), one of which was more or less a debate between Terry Corcoran (Financial Post Editor) and Andrew Van Iterson (Green Budget Coalition).  The piece was spurred by last week's news reports that the Liberals were supposedly </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/03/carbon-taxes-back-on-table.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-1515930398505341727</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 03:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T22:46:46.809-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>clean air industrial regulatory agenda</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>Pembina and CAN-RAC proposal for Large Final Emitters</title><atom:summary type='text'>Matthew Bramley of the Pembina Institute testified to the Clean Air Act Legislative Committee last week on behalf of Pembina and the Climate Action Network (CAN-RAC).  They've published their briefing note on both websites.  In a nutshell, it proposes that the forthcoming emissions trading system for big industry use absolute rather than intensity-based targets; set targets at 1990 -6% levels; </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/pembina-and-can-rac-proposal-for-large.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-6193342399514029157</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T18:05:41.340-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>Carbon taxes at the heart of FoE climate plan</title><atom:summary type='text'>Friends of the Earth Canada and Corporate Knights released a climate change plan today centred on carbon taxes.  It takes the large final emitter carbon tax/carbon subsidy they proposed a month ago and adds a general carbon tax on fuels.  Overall cost to an average family - 450-900$/year.Zero Leakage Carbon Investment Fund30$/tonne CO2e tax on LFE emissions (15$/tonne for manufacturing initially,</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/carbon-taxes-at-heart-of-foe-climate.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8888964049391434270</guid><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T13:21:17.363-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clean Air Act</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>GHG reductions targets</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>Clean Air Act Legislative Committee on Target Setting</title><atom:summary type='text'>The transcripts are now available for meetings 7 through 10 of the legislative committee on Bill C-30.  Here's a summary of meeting 7, which focused on target setting, with much additional discussion on policy.  The committee heard from Greenpeace, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce (CCC), the National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy (NRTEE), and Dr. Marc Jaccard of SFU.   Political </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/clean-air-act-legislative-committee-on.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-3420292508578064607</guid><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-28T22:45:47.655-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>clean air industrial regulatory agenda</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>2007 election</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>the Clean Air Industrial Regulatory Agenda</title><atom:summary type='text'>The Globe and Mail has been analyzing leaked documents describing the Conservative plan for an emissions trading system for big industry.  Basically, it looks like the Liberals' old Large Final Emitters (LFE) system, with slightly tougher targets and of course a brand new name.  Unfortunately, this means that most of the flaws of the old LFE system could still be present:intensity targets - the </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/clean-air-industrial-regulatory-agenda.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-3111998704623450551</guid><pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-19T22:24:21.860-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>Growing the economy with carbon taxes</title><atom:summary type='text'>Another freely available policy article from the journal Canadian Public Policy, this time from 1997.  University of Guelph prof Ross McKitrick looked at the effects of different options for recycling the revenue from a carbon tax.  The conclusion - if you recycle tax revenue the right way, you end up increasing overall welfare and GNP beyond the business-as-usual model, even without taking any </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/growing-economy-with-carbon-taxes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-2254147350902763475</guid><pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 03:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-19T15:56:39.615-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>1994 study on the distributional effects of a Canadian Carbon Tax</title><atom:summary type='text'>Back, back, to the distant first rumblings of interest in carbon taxes...or maybe not that far back.  Once the Rio Convention was signed back in 1992, many countries started looking at carbon taxes as one option for controlling greenhouse gas emissions.  This article ("Simulating the Distributional Effects of a Canadian Carbon Tax" describes one of Canada's early modelling attempts, done by </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/1994-study-on-distributional-effects-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-4039462519809749782</guid><pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-19T14:22:07.940-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>Some limitations of carbon taxes</title><atom:summary type='text'>Gar Lipow, a writer with the online environmental magazine Grist, wrote a good critique of carbon taxes back in November 2006.  He basically explains the price inelasticity of energy demand issue in more detail, and argues that carbon taxes aren't as efficient as standards, regulations and public works programs for achieving changes in energy use that require a lot of capital investment.   His </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/some-limitations-of-carbon-taxes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-5364453327555617903</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-15T11:59:54.239-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><title>Illustrious carbon tax advocates</title><atom:summary type='text'>From the brief submitted by David Boyd to the Bill C30 review committee last week, here are some carbon tax supporters:Al Gore, former Vice-president of the United StatesAlan Greenspan, former Chairman of the U.S. Federal ReserveJoseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize winner, former Chief Economist at the World BankNicholas Stern, author of the most comprehensive look at the economics of climate change, </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/illustrious-carbon-tax-advocates.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-3025584241910293427</guid><pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-15T10:28:36.614-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><title>Greenspan tells Toronto business leaders cap and trade won't work</title><atom:summary type='text'>A brief article in the National Post today on a speech by Alan Greenspan to a group of Toronto business folks...Greenspan is quoted as saying that cap and trade is either ineffective because the target is too high (a la EU system) or if effective, causes costs to rise sharply, knocking out competitivity and creating job loss.  Wonder if anyone asked him about carbon taxes?Link to NP articleLink </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/greenspan-tells-toronto-business.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8266287125218454431</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-14T18:05:40.035-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clean Air Act</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>2007 election</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions intensity</category><title>Clean Air Act Committee Meetings - Targets, Carbon Taxes and Emissions Trading</title><atom:summary type='text'>Just read over testimony from the February 6th meeting of the Clean Air Act Committee.  The Committee heard from Bill Erasmus (Assembly of First Nations), Claude Villeneuve (Université du Québec À Chicoutimi prof), David R. Boyd (BC prof, author), and Mathieu Castonguay (Association québecoise de la lutte contre la pollution atmosphérique).   There was a great deal of discussion on overall </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/clean-air-act-committee-meetings.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-305168558404091397</guid><pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-14T13:02:22.294-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon offsets</category><title>B.C. Green Plan announcement includes regional emissions trading</title><atom:summary type='text'>From today's National Post, the BC Liberal's throne speech apparently focused on climate change initiatives, including a commitment to build "a sensible, efficient system for registering, trading and purchasing carbon offsets and carbon credits in co-operation with the federal government and the U.S. states of California, Oregon, Alaska and Washington."  It isn't clear to me if they are just </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/bc-green-plan-announcement-includes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-8028912730296226385</guid><pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-12T17:20:59.675-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><title>CIBC's report on the potential impacts of Canadian GHG emissions trading</title><atom:summary type='text'>As reported in the Globe and Mail today, CIBC World Markets' regular Monthly Indicators newsletter includes an article on Canadian emissions trading entitled "Evaluating Carbon Risk in the Canadian Economy".   Briefly, they evaluate the vulnerability of Canadian industry sectors to the impacts of a cap and trade emissions trading system, concluding that coal-fired power plants, the oil and gas </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/cibcs-report-on-potential-impacts-of.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-5885771399676655334</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 21:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-11T22:46:55.402-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>Clean Air Act</category><title>Clean Air Act Committee - Liberals citing the Climate Action Network</title><atom:summary type='text'>Just going over the unofficial/unedited transcripts from the C-30 Committee from last week a bit more.  Nothing particularly exciting in their first meeting (December 14, 2006) - just a lot of discussion about committee format, etc., with plenty of partisan jockeying for position.  In the second meeting (Jan 29), they spent more time trying to set out a schedule for the committee meetings, which </atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/clean-air-act-committee-liberals-citing.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5506425357942683255.post-3405505747011345766</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-02-10T21:52:40.746-05:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>carbon tax</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>emissions trading</category><title>Mark Jaccard and Jack Mintz on carbon taxes and emissions trading</title><atom:summary type='text'>A week ago I reviewed an op-ed by the CEO of the C.D. Howe Institute, Jack Mintz, arguing against carbon taxes.  Today I came across a longer article in Alternatives magazine where Marc Jaccard of Simon Fraser debated the issue with Mintz.  I recommend reading the article because its a brief (2 page) summary of the principle arguments and counter-arguments around a carbon tax, by two particularly</atom:summary><link>http://canadiancarboncontrol.blogspot.com/2007/02/mark-jaccard-and-jack-mintz-on-carbon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Green policy junkie)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>